c9: (Contrails)
This weekend I happened to be near Parc Downsview Park with some time to kill, and I decided to try and find the Canadian Air & Space Museum, as I had never been. In fact, I didn't even know it existed until it hit the news a couple months ago, when its landlord (the federal government) served them with an eviction notice. Apparently their site is slated for redevelopment as a 4-pad hockey rink.

Members and volunteers at the museum are understandably upset about this. Hurting for funding and volunteers, and now losing their home, they're fighting back with letters to decision-making politicians and influencers, a petition, and an information campaign to help people realize what's happening. They even got some help from Harrison Ford! One challenge: they compete, in a sense, with the Canada Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa, the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum in Hamilton, plus other aeronautical museums out in western and Atlantic Canada on and off military bases. All of these museums have amazing stuff to offer and funding needs, so it's very hard to figure out whether they all should be kept.

Avro Arrow, Canadair Regional Jet 700-series, and de Havilland Beaver

One thing the Canadian Air & Space Museum has that none of the others have is an historic building at 65 Carl Hall Road that hosted some amazing elements of Canadian aerospace history. It's the original 1929 home of de Havilland Aircraft of Canada Ltd -- maker of the Dash-8 and many many more incredible aircraft. This building and others beside it (long gone now) were home to warplane and engine design and assembly, even satellites were built here. The Downsview site was hugely important in Canada's war efforts (and therefore Britain's too), and the building itself is really in good shape due to good construction. Sadly, the museum's funding is almost nonexistent -- over $100k behind in rent, for example, though the situation was improving when the eviction notice came. When I drove up there was an engine part sitting outside in the rain - a big problem for any museum that has more history to display than it has space to store.

I can't say for sure that I believe that building should be saved. It would be easiest for the museum, and Downsview has a LOT of space -- surely a hockey rink could be located across the parking lot, for example. Being forced out would result in the loss of several amazing pieces of history that would be damaged in the move, and if no storage could be located who knows what could happen to the many one-of-a-kind mid-restoration aircraft? It's scary to contemplate the death of a museum.

If a new location and sufficient storage space, and stable funding, were to be found, then I'd be OK with them changing locations. The building holds great meaning, but if the choice is die a slow death there or potentially grow and find new visitors elsewhere... it's all awful timing since the new York University subway extension will have its first new subway station only a couple hundred metres away. So many potential visitors! But that makes the land worth even more as something else of course.

Without official heritage designation, 65 Carl Hall Road is at risk. The locks have been changed, and a lockbox sits on the front door, but there are still volunteers and staff inside maintaining the museum. When I found it Sunday morning I tried the door just in case it was open. It wasn't, but a volunteer quickly ran to the door and let me in. He explained that the museum was closed to the general public by order of the landlord, but that members were still welcome... would I like to become a member? It took be about 3 nanoseconds to decide that I would like that very much indeed.

The gift shop helped me with my heavy wallet...

I'm so glad I went. I spent over two hours wandering the museum, photographing as much as I could. I knew that the chances of getting back to the museum soon, or ever, were slim. My photographs and captions can be viewed in this Facebook gallery. Sorry, non-Facebookers, but it appears to be accessible to all even logged out.

All photos: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151021988855593.767591.610245592&type=1&l=3e576d5ff0

I highly recommend a visit. Buy your membership online, throw in a small donation maybe, and head up there soon! TTC bus route 101 will take you right there from Downsview (soon to be Sheppard West) station. Let me know if you want somebody geeky to join you - I'll clear my calendar!
c9: (Curling)
Curling is my new obsession. I've always enjoyed watching it, and my cousins and parents have played for years, but I hadn't really ever spent any time on the curling ice. One work event in 2005, which I loved, and that was it.

But this year, a friend asked if I was interested in joining Toronto's gay curling league, and I jumped at it. We ended up with a team of friends which is wonderful, and our Skip (team captain, for those unfamiliar with curling lingo) is quite experienced but not worried about being the super-winningest team, so very supportive and coaches well. The others are friends that we never get to spend enough time with, and one has some high school curling experience and says nice things to me like "you win at curling" because I'm good at throwing rocks in the right direction. :-)

The schedule was a bit of a mess at first when combined with my own schedule, so I've only played three games so far compared to my team's seven. But I'm in like Flynn for the rest, and loving it. LOVING IT! I just feel so hesitant out there - it's weird, as it's been so long since I've tried to do something that I didn't have any developed skill at. I want to spend hours and hours on the ice practicing, just to get a better handle on things. I considered an iPhone app to play curling games in, but somehow I don't think that'll improve my real game.

And oh, my aching muscles! I've been going to physio for a shoulder problem, and as that is mostly healed curling didn't seem like a dangerous thing to do. But apparently ALL MY OTHER MUSCLES have been on vacation. And they KEEP TELLING ME ABOUT IT after the games. So that's interesting. Working on stretching, physio exercises, and icing my shoulder to make sure I actually heal and stop "pulling my everything" as I like to say.

Next stop (other than the weekly games): Ottawa Bonspiel! (tournament)  My cousin and great-aunt I'm sure will want to see me play, but I may need to find them a safe place to watch away from the most explicit gays - curling is a social, drinking-centric sport, and the gay curling league is especially!

Anyway, in honour of curling I have a new usericon for LiveJournal. Woo!
c9: (Banging my Head)
Sadly, it has basically left the news, but the federal government's destruction of the census has not been reversed. Not only that, but after spending months deriding the census as invasive and unnecessary, it is easy to believe that the voluntary longer survey will be ignored by many recipients, and the short census (which is still mandatory) will also be ignored and the legal requirement for it unenforced. Depressing.

A wonderful analogy appeared in the comments of this Maclean's blog posting by Aaron Wherry. Referencing the plight of Statistics Canada's many thousands of employees, the comment by a former StatsCan employee reads:

"It's like working all your life at Volvo being focused on car safety and then learning that the next model will have no seatbelts because people in focus groups find them uncomfortable."
c9: (House on Fire)
Note: This list is no longer being maintained. This is because the list of opponents to the census change is growing rapidly, and the opposition to this change can accurately be described as near-universal among groups who use the data. For more detailed and updated lists, please see http://eaves.ca/save-the-census-coalition/ and http://datalibre.ca/census-watch/

List of opponents to government's census change
List of supporters
Newspaper Editorial Boards:
Saskatoon Star-Phoenix
Calgary Herald
Winnipeg Free Press
Globe and Mail
Toronto Star
Montreal Gazette
Edmonton Journal
Victoria Times-Colonist
Ottawa Citizen
National Post
Halifax Chronicle-Herald

Members of Parliament / Political Parties:
New Democratic Party of Canada
Liberal Party of Canada
Green Party of Canada (although they don't support penalties, making their position incoherent)
Le Bloc Québécois
Conservative MP James Rajotte

Provinces, Municipalities & Related:
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities
City planners in Calgary and Red Deer
The Association of Municipalities of Ontario
Provincial officials in Quebec, BC and PEI
and Ontario

Associations, Boards, Groups, Charities, Think-tanks & Related:
The Statistical Society of Canada
The Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami
The Canadian Marketing Association
The Canadian Federation of Francophone and Acadian Communities
The Executive Council of the Canadian Economics Association
The director of the Prentice Institute at the University of Lethbridge
The senior economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
The Canadian Institute of Planners
The Canadian Association for Business Economics
The co-chairman of the Canada Census Committee
The Canadian Association of University Teachers
The Marketing Research and Intelligence Association
The Quebec Community Groups Network
The president of the CD Howe Institute
The Canadian Council on Social Development
The United Way in Toronto
Canadian Jewish Congress
The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada

Canadian Medical Association Journal
Director, Toronto Public Health
The French Language Services Commissioner of Ontario
The executive director of the Société franco-manitobaine
Toronto Board of Trade
Ontario Human Rights Commission (plus a letter to the Globe and Mail)

Private Sector Companies:
Ancestry.ca
The former head of Statistics Canada
Don Drummond, TD Bank

Others:
Former clerk of the Privy Council Alex Himelfarb
Frank Graves
The chief economist of the Greater Halifax Partnership
JJ McCullough
Kevin Milligan
@StephenFGordon
Tasha Kheiridden
Mike Moffatt
York University Prof. Valerie Preston, director of the CERIS research centre on immigration and settlement issues
 
Newspaper Editorial Boards:
Toronto Sun

Members of Parliament / Political Parties:
Conservative Party of Canada (implied)
Prime Minister Harper, and his Cabinet (implied)
Maxime Bernier
Dean del Mastro
Twitter fan and Industry Minister @TonyClement_MP

Initially anonymous supporters mentioned by the Minister:
Leo Fleming
Julius
Adam Adamou (@grazen)
Patrick
Paul
Chris

Elizabeth
Tyler


Provinces, Munipalities & Related:
none

Associations, Boards, Groups, Charities, Think-tanks & Related:
Fraser Institute

Others:
Warren Kinsella
Matt Bufton
PM Jaworski
Walter Block
Terrence Watson
Martin Masse
Hugh MacIntyre
Paul McKeever
@johnsonWilliam

 
Updated 2010-07-21 16:05 EDT

c9: (Banging my Head)
The federal government has announced that the census - run every five years in Canada - is being changed in 2011. The change which they seem to think is minor, is to spend $30 million more to send it out to more people, but to make most of the questions optional. They say the long form on the census is too intrusive, and the government threatening jail time is inappropriate.

In Canada, 80% of the population receives a short census form, with only five questions. 20% of the population receives a long form, with many more, very detailed questions - how many bedrooms in your home, how much money do you make, how far do you commute to work, etc. The census is required - everyone must complete it. If you don't, Statistics Canada will call you, visit you, remind you, pester you, and finally if nothing else works they will actually discuss the fines and potential for jail time. Like jury duty and paying taxes, a census is something required of residents.

The questions are very detailed, but Statistics Canada is very obsessive about privacy, to the point of not releasing census data from 100 years ago! In the past decade, the Privacy Commissioner has received only three complaints about the census in total.

The census is actually very important. Everything you do, every day, involves that data. The roads you travel on, the transit system - even where the bus routes go in your neighbourhood, the schools your kids attend, the community centres you swim at, the number of Members of Parliament supporting your city... the list goes on and on. Almost all large businesses use the census data as well.

The reason it's so important is that the census is a picture of the actual population. It's not estimated, extrapolated, or guessed-at. If the long form becomes voluntary, then the most vulnerable in your community - who are known to self-report less - will be at greater risk and have fewer resources available to them. The upper middle-class and rich will end up over-represented, and this is the group which many of us fall into -- you've got a computer and high speed internet, and a job? you're probably richer than you like to think.

Anyway. This is a big problem. This affects you. If this change stands, it will actually hurt our ability to effectively and efficiently provide government services, care for our less fortunate, and even just understand where everybody lives.

"Clement’s statistical illiteracy is so profound it gives one vertigo. The notion that simply making the sample bigger can’t fix a skewed sample is something undergraduates learn in first-year classes, yet is somehow beyond the mental grasp of a senior minister of a G8 country. And the comedic benefit of watching Clement fail first-year economics is undermined by the cold realization that he fundamentally does not understand the intellectual foundations of the files that he controls. When he is cornered by his intellectual betters, moreover, Clement’s instinct is to reach for the debating-hall comforts of cheap populism."
- http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/16/sometimes-a-gaffe-is-more-than-a-gaffe/

Learn more:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/why-you-should-care-about-the-long-census-forms-demise/article1630413/
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/835993--siddiqui-pm-facing-revolt-over-census-change
http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/12/the-census-coalition/

See the actual questions from 2006: http://www12.statcan.ca/IRC/english/ccr03_005_e.htm
c9: (Global Warming)
(Courtesy of The Walrus -- a magazine I regularly find to be worth my time.)

First, what's Peak Oil?

Oil will not just "run out" because all oil production follows a bell curve. This is true whether we're talking about an individual field, a country, or on the planet as a whole.

Oil is increasingly plentiful on the upslope of the bell curve, increasingly scarce and expensive on the down slope. The peak of the curve coincides with the point at which the endowment of oil has been 50 percent depleted. Once the peak is passed, oil production begins to go down while cost begins to go up.

In practical and considerably oversimplified terms, this means that if 2005 was the year of global Peak Oil, worldwide oil production in the year 2030 will be the same as it was in 1980. However, the world’s population in 2030 will be both much larger (approximately twice) and much more industrialized (oil-dependent) than it was in 1980. Consequently, worldwide demand for oil will outpace worldwide production of oil by a significant margin. As a result, the price will skyrocket, oil dependant economies will crumble, and resource wars will explode.

So why do we need to worry? Well, very few people are willing to honestly discuss how much oil, gas and coal are left.

The energy industry depends on everybody believing their product is going to be around for a long time (otherwise we would switch to other products), so they have an incentive to inflate their reserve estimates. Governments depend on everybody being stable, quiet, and well-behaved taxpayers, so they have an incentive to soften bad news. Additionally, they have to win elections, so they have an incentive to focus on the short-term.

But worst of all is us. We don't like hard problems, we don't like change, and we don't like the idea of not having STUFF. And everything -- EVERYTHING -- around us is made out of or with oil/gas/coal. Plastic. Electrical power. Cars. Roads. Subways. Planes. Food. Phones.

Canada is quite bad too. We like to pretend we're pretty special, but we're not. We're the 36th-most-populated country, but we use oil like we're #9.

The next three excerpts are from the actual article I'm finally getting around to recommending, An Inconvenient Talk:

[In 2008 the International Energy Association released] the latest edition of its annual World Energy Outlook, which predicts a global oil production peak or plateau by 2030. In a video that appears online soon after, the Guardian’s George Monbiot requests a more precise figure from the IEA’s chief economist, Fatih Birol. The official estimate, he confesses, is 2020. Monbiot also inquires as to the motivation for the IEA’s sudden about-face, and Birol explains dryly that previous studies were “mainly an assumption.” That is, the 2008 version was the first in which the IEA actually examined hard data, wellhead by wellhead, from the world’s 800 largest oil fields. Monbiot asks, with understandable incredulity, how it was that such a survey hadn’t been conducted previously. Birol’s response: “In fact, nobody has done that research.”

But what about Canada's tar or oil sands? (More on the name: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_sands)

The historical Energy Return On Energy Invested (EROEI) for conventional oil is 100:1. This refers to the kind of crude that gushes up in the opening credits of The Beverly Hillbillies, the kind that first flowed out of the Ghawar oil field in Saudi Arabia when it was tapped in 1948. Invest a barrel’s worth of energy drilling and refining in a spot like Ghawar, then and forever the largest single crude oil deposit on the planet, and you used to get 100 barrels of energy-dense, easily transported fuel in return. These days, conventional EROEI for such places is closer to 25:1.

The EROEI on more recent “new conventional” deposits, which Dave cites mostly by their discovery and extraction methods (“deepwater oil, horizontal wells, 3-D seismic”) is also around 25:1. In Alberta’s tar sands, the surface-mined bitumen comes to market at an EROEI of 6:1. “In situ” bitumen — sludge buried too far under the boreal forest floor to excavate, which comprises the lion’s share of the most breathless estimates of Canada’s energy superpower–scale oil production — rings in at 3:1. Corn ethanol, that darling of America’s farm states, is somewhere between 1.3:1 and 0.75:1. Shale oil, another unconventional source held by its boosters to be capable of indefinitely extending the age of oil, has never been converted into fuel at a net energy profit, at least as far as Dave has been able to ascertain.

A barrel of oil is pretty cheap these days, all things considered. But what if, sort-of-hypothetically-and-sort-of-not, what if we had no way to generate energy except ourselves?

As he drives, Dave indulges in a little academic exercise. He’s comfortable with numbers, quick with calculations. A barrel of oil, he tells you, contains about six gigajoules of energy. That’s six billion joules. Put your average healthy Albertan on a treadmill and wire it to a generator, and in an hour the guy could produce about 100 watts of energy. That’s 360,000 joules. Pay the guy the provincial minimum wage, give him breaks and weekends and statutory holidays off, and it would take 8.6 years for him to produce one barrel of oil equivalent (boe, the standard unit of measure in hydrocarbon circles). And you’d owe him $138,363 in wages. That, Dave tells you, is what a barrel of oil is worth.

Worth the read. http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2009.06-energy-an-inconvenient-talk/
c9: (Banging my Head)
After seeing this page on US State mottoes, I thought I'd look up Canada's various provincial mottoes. First, let me say that mottoes is a word that looks wrong no matter how one spells it. Second, seriously! (most translated from Latin, Nunavut translated from Inuktitut)

Newfoundland & LabradorSeek ye first the kingdom of God
Nova ScotiaOne defends and the other conquers
Prince Edward IslandThe small protected by the great
New BrunswickHope restored
QuebecI remember
OntarioLoyal she began, loyal she remains
ManitobaGlorious and free
SaskatchewanStrength from Many Peoples
AlbertaStrong and free
British ColumbiaSplendour without diminishment
Yukonnone
Northwest Territoriesnone
NunavutOur land, our strength

I can't decide if these are collectively better or worse than the US ones. Michigan has them beat in hubris of course. ("If you seek a pleasant peninsula, look about you.")

c9: (Global Warming)
...in Toronto at present:-17 (-28 with wind chill)
...in Kona, where I was 365 days ago:26 (28 with humidity)
...in Paris, where I was 20 days ago:6 (feels like 4)
...in our bedroom by the door:19
...by the window (where our heads are):11.5

Jeebus!

c9: (Politics)
From an email to a friend...

I'm pretty mixed on the situation. I think Harper clearly screwed up,
and lost the confidence of the House, but just hid from the vote by
delaying (which is legit but annoying) and then by proroguing (which I
think is pretty dangerous, it could have set a bad precedent).

Michaëlle Jean needed 2 hours of convincing to give him that though (I
think - can't wait for a tell-all book!) so hopefully she was very
resistant and set some rules or something so GGs in the future still
have flexibility and PMs can't just run and hide. She probably made
the right choice out of some shitty options.

The coalition is dead, I think. There are too many different competing
interests at play, and already you can see the Liberals fracturing all
over the place. As much as it's possible that A coalition could be a
good government, I think THIS coalition (because of the crappy state
of the Libs) would not have been very successful. I'd love to be
proven wrong on this, because I prefer their policies in general. But
the Liberals can't communicate these days (not just Dion), have no
leader with a mandate for these sorts of big decisions, and are
infighting already/again. *sigh*

If Harper spend the prorogation attacking and being all majority-ish
(60% odds IMHO), and the coalition stays together (30% odds), January
26th will be interesting! But all in all, I think we got the best
result of the worst possible options. If everything had actually
happened as fast as it tried to, I'm sure there'd be regrets in the
morning.
c9: (Politics)
First, House of Commons Procedure and Practice Online, a handy guide to just about everything House of Commons. Added: How Canadians Govern Themselves, 6th Edition, by Senator Eugene Forsey. (also, PDF version)

Second, help! I can't figure out if parliament can be prorogued before opposition days ("supply" days) happen! I'm sure the Governor General's aides do know and would enforce any requirements, but I just want to find the actual standing orders / legislation that covers this.

Third, a great big WTF to our House of Commons. The political geek in me is totally squeeing and having great fun. But I know in m heart this is actually a pretty messy situation that ought to have been dealt with better.

Primarily, the Conservatives / Stephen Harper should not have presented such ideologically-driven ideas in the fiscal update, and should have been more open about the existing stimuli that are in progress and why he thinks they're good.

The Liberal/NDP coalition is interesting, may do good things, may screw things up, who knows. But the optics are terrible and I really think it will damage the Liberals in the next election (unless there's a huge event or change that changes the subject of said election). Most Canadians don't really get the Parliamentary system, and all they see (goaded on by the pretty-much-lying Conservatives) is the losers of the last election somehow cheating the system. It's all legal, but not common, and I think people don't really like the consequences of minority government now that they're here.

I am amused to discover that, in our typical Canadian way, we've found a version of Proportional Representation without actually changing any laws. Same way we've dealt with abortion since the 80s actually. 'Maybe if we just ignore the issue, everything will be fine.' Ha!

Now back to pretending to work while actually surfing Canadian news sites and blogs obsessively.

Big News

Oct. 23rd, 2008 01:56 pm
c9: (Canadian Flag)
Incorrect list of top twenty newspapers in North America by circulation:

1. Toronto Star: 3,260,621
2. USA Today: 2,284,219
3. The Wall Street Journal (USA): 2,069,463
4. The Globe and Mail (Canada): 2,024,320
5. Le Journal de Montréal: 1,921,652
6. La Presse (Montreal): 1,524,582
7. Toronto Sun: 1,358,292
8. National Post (Canada): 1,236,020
9. The New York Times: 1,077,256
10. Vancouver Sun: 1,030,691
11. The Gazette (Montreal): 974,021
12. Ottawa Citizen: 919,931
13. Winnipeg Free Press: 885,986
14. The Province (Vancouver): 878,836
15. Edmonton Journal: 873,754
16. Calgary Herald: 866,553
17. Los Angeles Times: 773,884
18. Le Journal de Québec: 749,293
19. The Chronicle-Herald (Halifax): 736,371
20. Daily News (New York City): 703,137

Update: Note:
Canadian circulation numbers from March 2007 are weekly, USA circulation numbers from March 2007 are daily.
c9: (Politics)
Number of TVs: 1
Number of Laptops: like 200 it seems
Number of US Vice-Presidential Debates on TV: 1
Number of Canadian Federal Election Debates on TV: 0
Number of US Vice-Presidential Debates on Laptops: 0 as far as I can tell
Number of Canadian Federal Election Debates on TV: 1 as far as I can tell (mine)

Damn the scheduling!
c9: (Politics)
  1. Reading the macleans.ca liveblog of the debate is awesome and hilarious.
  2. The seated arrangement around a table actually really appeals to me. I think it's forcing them to be more polite on average, they aren't six feet from each other. They're also talking TO each other, (and pointing, and interrupting, etc) rather than playing to the cameras.
  3. One hilarious question was "say something nice about the leader to your left". The Maclean's gang hated it, but I really liked it, it's a nice "everybody be nicer" statement. It won't last, but still.
  4. I quake with fear about tomorrow's English debate -- because I'm sure it will disappoint me after the civility of the French debate, and I sigh with resignation about tomorrow's English debate -- because I'll be on a plane and I'll miss most of it. :-)
  5. Maclean's says Elizabeth May's French is awful, but since I'm watching the English translation on Newsworld I can't tell. My French is far worse, I'm sure. Seems like everybody's getting in some nice points though.
If anything exciting happens, I'll add to this post.
c9: (United Nations)
Some of you may remember me saying depressing things like this well over a year ago (US) and over two years ago (Canada). I'd love to be proved wrong, but now's as good a time as any to put my predictions on the table. (since they don't mean anything, why not immortalize them?)

Canada: a Conservative majority, but a very small one. Harper only needs 28 seats, and his positives in the categories of leadership and economy will give them to him. I think Quebec will give him serious gains (ten more seats?), and Ontario a bunch more. I'm not really sure on this, it's just a gut feeling. I'm certain Harper wins either an improved minority or weak majority, but I'm calling it majority as of today.

US: Democratic gains in House and Senate (not much could change that) but a McCain presidency. I would *really* like to be proven wrong, but I just see too much poor decision making among voters (everywhere, but really in the US for some reason). McCain used to be a decent person, but he's given up and is saying *anything* to win: outright lying repeatedly on television even when confronted by The View! Karl Rove says he's gone "a bit" too far! David Frum is questioning his decisions! I think Obama will make it very close, and is really doing some very good work around voter engagement, ground work in unusual states, and his policies and approach lead me to think he'd be a great president. But my gut just tells me McCain will win. So bring lots of alcohol if you're coming to my place November 4th.
c9: (Politics)
There's gonna be an election in Canada, starting in about a week. There's plenty of reasons not to, evidence either way, blah blah blah, but here's the rub: the Prime Minister just ordered the Governor-General to stay home instead of traveling to Beijing next week.

I was planning on working in the byelection and making some money, and now I'll lose that chance and have to work the main election instead. I hope the date is good so I can still be a Deputy Returning Officer!

Expect my politics tags to get a bit busier soon.

Fizzle.

Aug. 22nd, 2008 01:43 pm
c9: (Earth)
Dear Sir or Madam:

Further to the information you provided in Form 2 of the Canadian Space Agency’s Recruitment Campaign evaluation process, we regret to inform you that your application will not be considered further.

In completing Forms 1 and 2, you provided information in each of the following topics: Experience, Expertise, Education, Certification and Language. Based on the evaluation of the information provided, the Pre-selection Board has retained the top 2,000 candidates presenting the best results for further consideration in this evaluation process. Unfortunately, your application is not included in those 2,000 files.

We would like to thank you for your interest in the astronaut recruitment campaign and the Canadian Space Program, and wish you good luck in your future endeavours.

The Astronaut Recruitment Pre-selection Board

Two thousand?! I'm not even in the top two thousand?! Goddamn overachieving Canadians. :)
c9: (United Nations)
The conflict between Georgia, Russia, the sorta-separatists in the middle, and the rest of the west trying to figure out what to do, what to say, and how to avoid painting themselves into any corners is fascinating. Scary, too.

I've been following the commentary in a couple places, and found these columns to be quite illuminating and helpful in boiling down some issues that resonate with me.

First: “the west was right to leave [Saakashvili] hanging”: http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080813_107233_107233

Next, the rebuttal: http://blog.macleans.ca/2008/08/14/georgia-on-my-mind/

Today, "checking rhetoric against reality": http://blog.macleans.ca/2008/08/14/georgiarussia-on-the-wests-rhetoric/

I'm also regularly surprised to find the comments section on macleans.ca still tolerable and literate. Surely it's an accident which will be corrected soon (*sigh*). The comments sections on cbc.ca, theglobeandmail.com, and many others are depressing from a future-of-my-country standpoint. Also literacy, humour, science, geography, spelling, and fashion sense.
c9: (Earth)
I'm kinda pleased with how my cover letter turned out, so I thought I would share. Try to find the cutesy thing I did to amuse myself, since I figure this is my last involvement with the Canadian Space Agency. (answer at end)

All my life I've wanted to be involved in the space program. As a child in British Columbia my room was plastered with space shuttles, rockets, planets, and stars. I was forced to leave one wall blank white just so my mother wouldn't feel claustrophobic entering my room.

The Canadian Space Agency sits at the intersection of three things I hold very dear to my heart: space, Canada, and the importance of space sciences to understanding the world around us. The opportunity to become a part of this incredible enterprise is one that I could not pass by, and one which I know in my heart I would stop at nothing to help make it successful.

I know that CSA needs strong scientists to ensure that missions are a success, and I have followed the achievements of our previous astronaut candidates with interest. But I worry that CSA also requires communicators, and this is where I would excel within the team. We are surrounded today by strong conflict around climate science, evolutionary science, peak oil, and many other game-changing events for our civilization, but our decision-makers do not have the scientific backgrounds required to separate fact from fiction. CSA and its partner agencies around the world help with that endeavour, and astronauts form a large part of the public face of that effort.

As a Canadian astronaut, I would work tirelessly to bring both the excitement of discovery and the potential for innovation to the public. I work with students every day in my adult education classes and I love nothing more than to see their faces light up with the thrill of understanding technology and learning to better their careers and their lives. Science has brought us incredible improvements in our way or life and our ability to learn about our planet and our universe, and that thrill is needed more than ever as we confront new and greater challenges to our health and the health of our home.

I see my role as being a challenger to the status quo. While governments and corporations each seek answers by looking inward and by reacting, our scientific exploration must look outward and must by nature travel in unexpected directions. Our astronauts are not just cogs in the mission machine, matching this component to this module. In fact, our astronauts are the human face on the CSA budget, the excitement on the scientific journal article, and the inspiration for thousands of Canadian children to pay attention to science and bring their own accomplishments to our country.

To this end, I bring extensive teaching, team management, and communications experience to your team. I am trained and certified in teaching, communications, and team management (see resume for details). I regularly have to transcend language barriers, bias and prejudice, and learner competency levels to ensure requirements are achieved, deadlines are met, and clients are happy with their classroom experience. My experience with defusing conflict and ensuring clarity of communication can only add to the success of CSA and my team.

Not only can I teach, but even more importantly I can learn. As a technical trainer, I am regularly called upon to learn new technologies even before general release of the product, and then effectively design and deliver training to a highly technical audience with specific timelines and requirements. My client evaluations show success in this endeavour, with satisfaction scores averaging over 95%.

From watching Marc Garneau on Challenger and Roberta Bondar on Discovery making Canadian history, to seeing Steve MacLean on Atlantis and Dave Williams on Endeavour continuing Canada’s and humanity’s achievements, I have dreamed of bringing anything and everything I have to the Canadian Space Agency and the Canadian Astronaut Corps. I look forward to seeing further successes for CSA, and I hope to one day be a part of making them happen.

Sincerely,

Cameron MacLeod


If you spot an error, then I'm screwed, because it's due at 9pm eastern and I'm going to be out of the house until after that. God, I hope there's nothing stupid in there. :-)


* I included all the different Space Shuttle names in my text in non-space contexts. The only one I couldn't do without it being awkward was Atlantis, so I included it by name in my final paragraph.
c9: (Earth)
The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is recruiting two new Canadian astronauts. I applied (along with over 5000 others) and I reached the second stage! (this was not too tricky)

Stage two however is a little bit harder. Especially with a crappy GPA and no orbital mechanics experience. *sigh*

At least I can try to regain some ground with my cover letter. But what can I say that beats a super-Physics PhD who's also a pilot? (no stealing, [livejournal.com profile] primary_suspect!)

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 06:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios