Thank goodness for the dog.

[c9]

Yay for dogs!

(the following is made up, not real, and should not be used to influence your vote on Monday)

NDP response: Guns are bad, so we're banning them more, and we're announcing the Canada Dogs Act. Alexa adds: Julian Fantino should resign, I'm so shocked and appalled.

Liberal response: Guns are (mumble mumble). Let me be clear: dogs are (mumble mumble).

Bloc response: Les chiens seront heureux a la souvreineté, et nous esperons que tous les Quebecois et Quebecoises votez pour une Quebec libre pour tous les chiens.

Conservative response: Clearly there is no need for the gun registry. Additionally, the market is best equipped to determine the appropriate number of dogs in each park, so a Conservative government will provide a $1000-per-dog tax credit for all families who own a gun.

Comments

[nihilicious.livejournal.com]

But you're missing the real issue:

Dogs--Should they be part of the Canada Health Act? I think they should.

[c9.livejournal.com]

I'm sorry, but because you included several verbs, candidates will be able to understand your comment. 5 demerits.

[x-23.livejournal.com]

Should dogs have rights then? Should they have the right to marry?

[nihilicious.livejournal.com]

My party, after a free vote, would use the notwithstanding clause to ensure that no public funds go to support the right of gay dog foetuses to marriage under the Canada Health Act.

[c9.livejournal.com]

I'm not so sure I want to go to any of your parties. They sound complicated.