I agree of course, just doing a survey. I erase apostrophes on whiteboards and blackboards at work, restuarants and bars. People look at me funny. Then I say "Vinny, stop looking at me funny."
Well of course it really comes down to that same old argument, prescriptive or descriptive language. What people actually do is correct, it doesn't matter what the dictionary (or the NYT :) does.
For acronyms, I believe the prescriptive answer is that no apostrophe is correct in English, and I find it surprising that the Times would have it otherwise in their style guide. But people do use it both ways, so it really doesn't matter in the real world.
Here's a good one for you. If car belongs to the Steeves family do you write "this is the Steeves' car?" or "this is the Steeves's Car?" or even more rediculously "this is the Steeveses car?"
It's my damn name and I don't know how to do the plural possessive!
That was actually the question posed in an article of last month's Atlantic. Apparently, the correct answer is "Steeves's" unless the word following it begins with an s". But I think that looks silly, so I vote "Steeves'".
Please don't. It's a pretend rule that has no real principle supporting it. It ignored the fact that "over" has a metaphoical sense. Most style manuals have abandoned it.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:05 am (UTC)it's not possessive.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:09 am (UTC)the 1980's
or
on people's mailboxes: the Smith's
argh!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:15 am (UTC)i bought some CDs today.
--
i can't find the CD's cover.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:25 am (UTC)Like you'd write there are two A's in the word 'Annual' and not two As.
I think it's CD's.
:P
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:30 am (UTC)http://tranchant.plus.com/notes/apostrophe
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:35 am (UTC)'Cause if you are I will google a site that indicates I am correct.
:D
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:51 am (UTC)The New York Times seems to write CD's... who's Mark again?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:54 am (UTC)For acronyms, I believe the prescriptive answer is that no apostrophe is correct in English, and I find it surprising that the Times would have it otherwise in their style guide. But people do use it both ways, so it really doesn't matter in the real world.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:36 am (UTC)hmmm, maybe not, now that i look at it.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:48 am (UTC)It's my damn name and I don't know how to do the plural possessive!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:50 am (UTC)Steeveses' Car: two families sharing ownership of one car.
:)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 09:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 08:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 12:13 pm (UTC)(Which I've now decided to stop harping on as one of my Buddhist resolutions.)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 12:40 pm (UTC)I was recently reminded of the "fewer" vs "less" rule. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 11:53 am (UTC)According to the RIAA, you don't own the CDs. You're mearly licensing the performance contained therein.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 11:54 am (UTC)Touché!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-09 12:02 pm (UTC)wait a minute...
Date: 2006-03-09 03:48 pm (UTC)Re: wait a minute...
Date: 2006-03-09 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 07:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-10 07:47 am (UTC)