Student Debt
Aug. 16th, 2004 09:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
c9Which scheme is more workable?
1. Universities charge $4000 per student in tuition, government supplies $10000 per student in funding. (essentially, status quo). Students graduate with an average of $20,000 student debt. Universities forced to cut programs and services to maintain best programs. Adding more students past a certain bar actually reduces the per-student funding from government. (this is also the status quo)
2. Universities let tuition float, completely capitalist, with one year of tuition rising to $10,000 or even $15,000. But almost all of the money is plowed back into bursaries and grants for lower-income students, and the remaining money is used to improve programs and services. This means that the richer students, the ones most able to afford high tuition, pay it, and the least able don't. Could be cynically called another tax.
Paul Wells, a conservative-yet-often-quite-socialist columnist in Maclean's, is blogging on about tuition fees of late. Interesting reading. Tell me (and him too) where his mistakes are. (visit the link and read from the bottom up)
He claims that average student debt for graduates of Harvard is $12,000 CDN. I can't find proof, but have only searched for a few minutes.
1. Universities charge $4000 per student in tuition, government supplies $10000 per student in funding. (essentially, status quo). Students graduate with an average of $20,000 student debt. Universities forced to cut programs and services to maintain best programs. Adding more students past a certain bar actually reduces the per-student funding from government. (this is also the status quo)
2. Universities let tuition float, completely capitalist, with one year of tuition rising to $10,000 or even $15,000. But almost all of the money is plowed back into bursaries and grants for lower-income students, and the remaining money is used to improve programs and services. This means that the richer students, the ones most able to afford high tuition, pay it, and the least able don't. Could be cynically called another tax.
Paul Wells, a conservative-yet-often-quite-socialist columnist in Maclean's, is blogging on about tuition fees of late. Interesting reading. Tell me (and him too) where his mistakes are. (visit the link and read from the bottom up)
He claims that average student debt for graduates of Harvard is $12,000 CDN. I can't find proof, but have only searched for a few minutes.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-08-17 09:14 am (UTC)next, grants. again, there are two kinds. federal and individual school grants. federal grants are few and far between. they are basically "free money" for you. but these PELL grants are hard to qualify for. you basically have to be dirt poor and show 100% financial need (more on that later). individual schools may also offer grants, usually more like a scholarship, that you can apply for based on either need or academics. again, depends on how big the school's endowment is, etc...
work-study is basically a job you have during school, working for the university in some capacity, where both the federal government and the school sort of "front" you the money... it goes toward your bill, and then you "work it off" sort of thing. these are usually low-paying, and are only to supplement other types of aid you get.
many students also take out private loans from regular banks and credit companies.
now ALL of this, every single piece of it, is regulated by the FAFSA... "Free Application for Federal Student Aid" Nearly 100% of schools in the US require EVERY student to fill one of these out. why? because the schools want to know one magical number... the EFC.
what's the EFC you ask? it's only the golden number. it stands for "Expected Family Contribution". basically, it's a flat dollar amount that the US Government believes you and your family should be responsible for and they tell the schools you're applying to that number. they take into consideration your records, and your family's tax records and incomes, owned property, assets and liabilities, etc... it's quite a financially-invasive form (over 100 questions i believe). and you have to do it every year, just in case your incomes change.
my EFC? $0.00. that's why the two schools i applied to both offered free rides through the grants they had and all that stuff. my academic record (they really wanted me) combined with the fact that the federal govn't said i would be able to pay $0.00 (they might lose me) made them "show me the money".
my friend amy's EFC was nearly $28,000.00. why? her dad owned real estate and had lots of savings. so she was offered next to nothing from Penn, even though her academic record was slightly better than mine. she showed them though. through private scholarship organizations, she was able to almost secure her own free ride.
phew! i think that's about it. there are nuances here and there... things i've forgotten about, etc...
more questions? please, ask!