I like it so far. The previous Kodak was wonderful - simple, great pictures. This one seems to be similar, and faster, which is nice. It has far too many onboard processing bells and whistles -- on-the-fly stitching of panoramic shots, cropping, etc, and it has no viewfinder, only the LCD -- but it's pretty neat all in all.
The lack of a viewfinder seems to be a growing trend among digital cameras. As a photography fanatic (of sorts) I'm not a fan of the trend at all. I like to have a choice. A viewfinder comes in handy when I need to turn off the LCD screen to save battery power AND when the sun is so bright I can't see my screen (this one happens more often for me than the low battery - grrr).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
momijizukamori
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-10-01 11:46 pm (UTC)I have never tried a recent Kodak, how do you like the interface and usability?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-02 01:52 am (UTC)I like it so far. The previous Kodak was wonderful - simple, great pictures. This one seems to be similar, and faster, which is nice. It has far too many onboard processing bells and whistles -- on-the-fly stitching of panoramic shots, cropping, etc, and it has no viewfinder, only the LCD -- but it's pretty neat all in all.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-02 04:48 pm (UTC)