c9: (Default)
[personal profile] c9
It simply can't be pecked.

Busy on December 28 anyone?

Date: 2006-12-20 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rostin79.livejournal.com
that's my birthday! :)

Date: 2006-12-20 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rostin79.livejournal.com
get the hell out of here. I should read articles before I respond. My birthday, for real? Granted, I started the trend before this study was done.... :)

Date: 2006-12-21 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplemartini.livejournal.com
I wonder if it's a co-incidence that my scheduled induction is on the 27th? It could very well mean that the baby would be born on the 28th.

Mind you, I will be 41 weeks and 3 days by that point so no worries that it's merely for the tax credit. LOL.

Date: 2006-12-21 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarah-sosiak.livejournal.com
Hmm...do you think it's too late for me to start work on "Project Have a Dependent by the New Year"?

Date: 2006-12-21 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] primary-suspect.livejournal.com
Not unless the New Year you are talking about is 2008. ;-)

But you never said it had to be biologically yours. I'm sure you could go to some developing country and pretend you are a big US celebrity and have a dependent within 24 hours.

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 07:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios