c9: (politics)
[personal profile] c9
... But here's an ad I'd run this weekend, if I was a Grit and seriously worried I was about to lose big:

BLANK BLACK SCREEN

TYPE APPEARS ACROSS SCREEN AS DEEP, URGENT VOICE READS TEXT:

"Foreign Minister Stockwell Day"

SCREEN DARKENS; RELIGHTS ON LIBERAL LOGO; BRIGHT WOMAN'S VOICE READS:

"On January 23, Vote Liberal."

Date: 2006-01-06 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c9.livejournal.com
Almost certainly not. My political views lie somewhere between Liberal and NDP, and part of me really wants Paul Martin and his cronies out. I don't like the idea of a Tory government, but I know it has to happen either this time or next, and at least this time it's a minority. But anyway, I'm almost sure I'll be voting on principle for the party I prefer to hold some sway, the NDP.

Date: 2006-01-06 05:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ratonil.livejournal.com
Interesting. Here I do vote for the ruling coaltion (center-left), even though I think we need a change. They have been in La Moneda for 16 years... but in the other hand, the Conservative alliance is not what I want... specially a billionaire as a president.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-01-06 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ratonil.livejournal.com
Yeap, so passé. That's why I'm voting for an agnostic, socialist and single mother.

If people think we'll be richer just because a successful businessman is president... they're so fucking wrong.

Date: 2006-01-06 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simplisticton.livejournal.com
I really hope people don't think that way... I mean, George Bush ran every company he ever headed straight into the ground...

OTOH, Paul Martin ran a very successful shipping company, and managed to do good things as Finance Minister (only G8 country running a surplus, that's gotta count for something!)

Date: 2006-01-06 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c9.livejournal.com
True -- PM made a really good Finance Minister. Too bad he wanted a different job.

Date: 2006-01-06 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skeezix1000.livejournal.com
I always wondered what Paul Martin's tenure as PM would have been like had Chretien not left him with the pile of dog sh*t that is the sponsorship scandal.

Date: 2006-01-06 09:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c9.livejournal.com
I think if Martin had been willing to just sit down, shut up, and wait for the never-defeated Chrétien to retire on his own terms, sponsorship would have pushed him out instead of tarring Martin. A great "what if" for history.

Date: 2006-01-06 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamincan.livejournal.com
Also, I think Martin completely lacks the leadership ability of Jean Chretien. Despite all his flaws, I'm almost entirely convinced that he would have managed the scandal far better than Martin has.

Date: 2006-01-06 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c9.livejournal.com
Oh totally. His appearance at the Gomery commission alone proved that to me.

Date: 2006-01-06 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ratonil.livejournal.com
Here Mr Piñera (pr: pignera) owns a TV Station, Chile's main airlines, has stocks in some pension and insurance companies... and owns a lot of land in the south of the country.

Scary.

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 09:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios