A few things.
Oct. 17th, 2004 11:24 amFirstly, I hope all the Nova Scotians reading this voted! Because you're all complainers just like me, so if you didn't vote, it's your own fault.
Secondly, why are people so stupid?!?
- John Hamm and the Tories are stupid because they could have made some inroads in the urban centres by just allowing limited Sunday shopping, and it would have been a much smaller deal. Instead they tried to leverage their rural voter base, and succeeded in reminding the cities that the Tories don't care about their wishes or needs.
- Voters are stupid because they were most worried about people having to work on Sundays, and PEOPLE ARE ALREADY FORCED TO WORK ON SUNDAYS! Look at the parking lot of the mall TODAY: dozens of cars. People are forced to work, they're just disallowed from SHOPPING. Unless it's for prepared food, cigarettes, or magazines. The law provides plenty of loopholes.
If the problem is poor treatment of workers ("you must work on Sunday") then change the law to force fair treatment of workers. Don't ignore that problem, create a false argument between the farmers and the city dwellers, and then crow about it later.
I'd never make a good politician, I have no patience for this kind of idiocy.
Finally, kudos to
disasternat for a strong campaign and being willing to bring up issues and fight for what he believes in. Keep an eye on him, this guy's going to go far.
Secondly, why are people so stupid?!?
- John Hamm and the Tories are stupid because they could have made some inroads in the urban centres by just allowing limited Sunday shopping, and it would have been a much smaller deal. Instead they tried to leverage their rural voter base, and succeeded in reminding the cities that the Tories don't care about their wishes or needs.
- Voters are stupid because they were most worried about people having to work on Sundays, and PEOPLE ARE ALREADY FORCED TO WORK ON SUNDAYS! Look at the parking lot of the mall TODAY: dozens of cars. People are forced to work, they're just disallowed from SHOPPING. Unless it's for prepared food, cigarettes, or magazines. The law provides plenty of loopholes.
If the problem is poor treatment of workers ("you must work on Sunday") then change the law to force fair treatment of workers. Don't ignore that problem, create a false argument between the farmers and the city dwellers, and then crow about it later.
I'd never make a good politician, I have no patience for this kind of idiocy.
Finally, kudos to
no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 03:41 pm (UTC)i'm SO confused...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 03:44 pm (UTC)No Sunday shopping in NS. Unless it's a convenience store, a magazine shop, or restaurant/pub venue. BUT retail employees can be forced to work to do inventory, restock shelves, clean, and do all those other job things -- as long as they don't interact with customers.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 03:48 pm (UTC)is there more of this in canada?
impart knowledge, now!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 09:09 pm (UTC)(Most areas of the western world have Sabbath-type restrictions, though we're gradually letting people's religion be personal and private, finally)
NS is the only remaining province with no form of Sunday shopping (even though, as I described above, there's all sorts of it anyway). NB has the last five months of the year allowing sunday shopping, and PEI the last six weeks of the year. Some studies show there is no real increase in retail revenue, only distribution of the same money over a longer period. Not sure if that's been mostly disproven or what.
Also, one negative: Sunday shopping can encourage more Sunday driving by SUVs and Hummers and other moron-transporters, leading to more traffic and more pollution (who takes the bus to the mall? not "grownups"...)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 04:32 pm (UTC)I'm not sure where the studies stand. But someone explained it to me this way: Do you really think that the average monthly expenditures for a NB family for, say, October, are significantly more than for the comparable NS family? After all, any increased retail revenue would have to come from somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-17 09:09 pm (UTC)