c9: (privacy)
[personal profile] c9
The suggestion that customer name and address information is not sensitive information because it is the sort of info listed in a phone book misses the point. The sensitivity of the information depends on the context. Your name on a list of residents in a city is not particularly revealing, but your name on a list of people who are being treated for depression surely is. If police are looking for a customer's name and address, it's not because they're carrying out a census. It's because they think they have something nasty to connect that person to. And if they are looking for it without a warrant, it's because they don't have enough evidence to satisfy a judge or a justice of the peace. Or because they think constitutional rights to privacy are an inconvenience.
- http://ping.fm/UDj37

Date: 2009-06-19 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrover.livejournal.com
I agree. Consider the case where someone is using the net to criticize the police or local government. There have been US cases where officials have abused this authority so they could identify their critic.

Date: 2009-06-19 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bonoboboy.livejournal.com
I first heard of this again through slashdot recently ... glad some Canadians are picking up on this!

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 08:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios