c9: (politics)
[personal profile] c9
Everybody in Canada goes on and on about strategic voting, which is actually misnamed. It should be called tactical voting, since it's a single tactic contrary to your overall interests, exercised individually, not an overarching strategy commanded centrally and consistently over time.

But anyway. The gist is this: You like Party A, then party B second, then Party C third. A has no chance of winning, so you vote B to ensure that C doesn't win. Most commonly, A=NDP, B=Liberal, and C=Conservative.

The problem is most people forget that a Canadian election is really 308 little elections, and the national polls don't matter. So Joe Canadian thinks A has no chance *nationally*, so he votes B, even though in his riding A would have won if they had his vote. This happened all over last time, to the NDP's detriment (and the Liberals' amusingly, since a stronger NDP would have meant they could form a stable coalition).

So if you must vote "strategically," please make sure you know what you're doing. Learn more here.

Date: 2006-01-06 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bcboi.livejournal.com
This is interesting.
In 2004, I was in the Ottawa-Vanier riding, and was pro-Liberal on the count of the same-sex marriage issue being the hot-topic of the day. This election, I'm in the Skeena-Bulkley Valley riding and have high hopes for the (hot) incumbent NDP MP, Nathan Cullen. www.nathancullen.com

I think he's safe...but I'd love to see your analysis of my riding.

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 09:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios