Homosexuality and Star Trek
Oct. 27th, 2005 05:59 pm
So Mr. Sulu is gay! Well, George Takei is. That's cool. I'm glad he was able to take this step -- it's not many 68-year-olds who come out. Thanks to
Star Trek has had a long, and frankly depressing, history with GLBT representation. (way more info than anybody needs!) In the sixties, the show was renowned for featuring diversity when it was unusual, interracial relations (Kirk and Uhura kissed) when it was never done, and (most importantly) peace on Earth. Nobody was trying to get the queers on TV back then, but when Star Trek: The Next Generation showed up, queer issues were front and centre in the world. Gene Roddenberry said there would be gay characters. The stars wanted gay characters. But nothing.
In 1996 we thought that Lt Hawk, a new character in the movie that year, was going to be gay. No such luck. Gene Roddenberry's replacement contradicted statements by the actor and crew to that effect, saying he was definitely straight. A later novel, Rogue, explicitly made him gay (though not explicitly gay!). But novels aren't canon, which means they don't count. Also, he died in the movie. :(I really used to enjoy Star Trek, but the newer series got less and less interesting to me. Partly due to not seeing myself reflected in that universe. I'm probably the only one who cares about this, but whatever.
It's at this point that someone mentions how stylish and metrosexual the Star Trek pointy sideburns are.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:27 pm (UTC)I guess it was just typical to what happens when it stopped becoming a show and instead became a franchise. No surprises, nothing to rock the boat.
However with the fact that there have been a distinct lack of male hotties on the show, maybe it was for the best.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:37 pm (UTC)Homophobes see Star Trek as "proof"? Wow, they're more messed up than I thought.
It's actually one thing which really leaves ST in the cold, as I can't think of any other significant show that has been so "homo-free". Hmmm
Buffy: The whole Tara/Willow thing of course. And there was some dorky closet case in the last couple of seasons.
Babylon 5: Ivanova/Talia, which was never explicit. But there none-the-less.
Doctor Who: New series of course. Captain Jack.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:49 pm (UTC)That whole issue really kind of pissed me off, I blame Rick Berman.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 07:46 pm (UTC)Torias Dax, a joined Trill male, had married Neilani Kahn, a joined Trill female. Torias was a test pilot, and he took a lot of unnecessary risks. This led to his death at a very young age.
Eighty years later, Jadzia Dax (Terry Farrell) has the opportunity to work with Dr. Lenara Kahn (Susanna Thompson), both female, and both subsequent hosts to the Dax and Kahn symbionts. There are taboos in Trill society regarding re-association, which basically means becoming romantically involved with the mate of a former host. Jadzia and Lenara discover that the love between Torias and Neilani has survived in their symbionts, and they cannot help but be drawn to each other.
The issue against their being together is not lesbianism, it is the Trill taboo against re-association.
Now, of course, Jadzia Dax goes on to marry Worf, so things didn't work out - but I thought the whole story was handled very sweetly. It was the closest Trek ever got to portraying a homosexual relationship.
I think it's a shame. Altho, there is evidence that there are no gay people in the Trek universe - have you seen how some of those quarters are decorated? :-P
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 08:09 pm (UTC)And please: how many queers do you know who like large swoopy metal wall decorations, single colour carpet throughout the home, and ... I can't come up with a punchline for this, so please just imagine I made a funny.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 08:54 am (UTC)