At
leapfish's request, I rented, and we watched, Monster-in-Law.
Some movies are so bad they need their own scale. I, in consultation with
leapfish, have created a new five-point scale. This scale spans the distance between what is commonly known as "no stars" and "one star."
My scale ranges from SpiceWorld, at the high end, and anything starring Chris Farley and David Spade on the low end.
I give Monster-in-Law two Spice Girls out of five.
For reference, on this scale American Beauty would receive 302 Spice Girls.
Some movies are so bad they need their own scale. I, in consultation with
My scale ranges from SpiceWorld, at the high end, and anything starring Chris Farley and David Spade on the low end.
I give Monster-in-Law two Spice Girls out of five.
For reference, on this scale American Beauty would receive 302 Spice Girls.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 08:38 pm (UTC)And if you haven't seen that (which, omg, if you haven't, what rock were you living under during the 80s?), I will accept ratings for Mr. Mom and Tootsie.
;)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:08 pm (UTC)i know it's bad, but i still love it!
no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 06:12 am (UTC)In the first case, Showgirls is bad, and would get about 4 Spice Girls (still better than Monster-in-Law. In the second case, where Showgirls is so bad that it's good, it gets more like 12 or 13 Spice Girls (~2 stars).
It's important to note that the scale is not reverse-logarithmic, meaning it takes more and more Spice Girls to reach the next level of quality each time.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 11:05 am (UTC)I'm just giving in that way. :-P
no subject
Date: 2005-10-24 07:26 am (UTC)