c9: (Default)
[personal profile] c9
A quick history of New Orleans, which helps explain to a certain extent the curious design. (sorry for the wide image)


(Thanks CNN!)

Date: 2005-09-01 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-hill-latte.livejournal.com
I was listening to an levee expert on NPR last night who was saying that the levees had been built to only fail in the event of a "storm of the century" while other levees are typically built to only fail in the event of a "storm of the millenium" or "storm of the past 10 00 years". So, basically, the levees were almost guarenteed to fail within 100 years of being built.

Date: 2005-09-01 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-hill-latte.livejournal.com
Ugh. Given how picky I've been about other people's logic lately I didn't explain that as well as I would have liked. Here's a second attempt:

The levees in NO were built to withstand a storm of power less than "x". Most levees in first world nations are built to withstand storms of power up to "y" or even "z".

Storms of power "x" happen every 100 years or so.

Storms of power "y" happen every 1 000 years or so.

Storms of power "z" happen every 10 000 years or so.

So, basically, they built the levees knowing that there was a near 100% chance they would fail within 100 years.*

*Caveat: my statistical logic might not be exactly correct on that one. It's been a while since I spent time in Singer hall.

Date: 2005-09-01 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c9.livejournal.com
I read something similar, describing that the levees were somewhat recently rebuilt / improved to contain a Cat3 hurricane. "Why not Cat5?" everyone screams today, and the answer of course is money. It would cost billions of dollars to build out to that extent, and the design work apparently isn't even complete -- had they committed to Cat5 containment, they still would have been at about the same status as last week.

Date: 2005-09-01 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] primary-suspect.livejournal.com
I bet they are glad they saved all that money now... ;-)

Date: 2005-09-01 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simplisticton.livejournal.com
Saved? They didn't save it. They spent it on something else. Four letters.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2005-09-02 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simplisticton.livejournal.com
A bit of both :-)

Date: 2005-09-02 06:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] primary-suspect.livejournal.com
Does it rhyme with "crack"? ;-)

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 12:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios