c9: (Global Warming)
c9 ([personal profile] c9) wrote2007-04-03 07:47 pm
Entry tags:

Canada, in a nutshell

Tonight's news featured a report on an opinion survey around climate change and addressing the costs.

[a few questions showing Canadian support for protecting the planet, etc. Then...]

- most Canadians would be against a higher gas tax
- most Canadians would be against laws requiring them to not use their car one day per week
- most Canadians would be against a $10 charge to drive downtown
- most Canadians want Canada to live up to its Kyoto commitment

*sigh*

(for the Americans: this is a common theme in Canadian politics. We want it all, for cheap. Health care, cigarettes, booze, highways, transit, ... they're all the same to some portion of our brains. It's surreal.)

[identity profile] joecdn.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I read something similar in the media here that suggested that Canadians would be willing to pay more if it meant protecting the environment, but they'd like to see other taxes (such as the gas taxes) directed towards protecting the environment since vehicles, for example, are large contributors to global warming.

http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article.jsp?content=20070402_094851_1216

Anyways...in the case of gas taxes - I'd be against any increase in gas tax here in Vancouver, since we already pay through the nose. We pay 12 cents per litre to Translink (the regional transportation authority), in addition to any provincial or federal taxes that are levied on fuel - and they're trying to raise that to 15 cents per litre. Currently, our gas price is sitting at around $1.16 per litre, and when you compare that to Seattle, just to the south of us - they're only paying $0.94 per litre. I think we're paying enough...even Toronto is only paying about $1.00 per litre right now.

[identity profile] c9.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
How much would you pay for a litre of bottled water?

[identity profile] joecdn.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
Ummm....I dunno - but I'd definitely be willing to pay more for a bottle of water given the need to protect our natural resources. I just don't like the idea of being gouged for fuel - especially considering where they money goes for the most part (to greedy assholes like GW Bush).

[identity profile] c9.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I found a website you might find interesting -- Vancouver's definitely the highest!!

http://www.gasbuddy.com/GB_Price_List.aspx

Excerpt (today's prices):

ProvincePrice
Alberta96.774
Manitoba99.512
Ontario102.543
Saskatchewan 102.929
New Brunswick 103.913
Quebec 105.540
British Columbia 107.138
PEI 111.843
Nova Scotia 113.091
Newfoundland 114.492


City Price
Calgary 97.830
Edmonton 97.892
Winnipeg 100.236
Hamilton 101.057
Toronto 101.229
London 101.687
Regina 103.577
Saskatoon 103.653
Quebec City 108.400
Halifax 110.874
Montreal 113.388
Victoria 114.500
Vancouver 117.066

[identity profile] zedinbed.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
Interestingly, vehicles contribute only 6% to greenhouse emission. Of course, that 6% too much but considering their utility, I think we can target other ways of reducing our emissions with better results.

My source for that weird statistic is the the NY Times article on the US Supreme Court's decision to ask the federal government to review their global warming policy.

[identity profile] gueny.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
I read somewhere recently (I think it was this morning on the the cover of the Edmonton Journal), that most Canadians would be willing to pay a "green tax". I have no idea what this is, and I'm sure nobody else does either, hence probably the reason why they support it.

[identity profile] c9.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Toronto's talking about a new fee for garbage and recycling and compost collection, probably as a way to gather more money for the city's needs. Calgary tried this recently, and (shock!) it was voted down in a huge city-wide tempest.

Show people the tax, and they won't like it. Hide it, like the 11% tax that the GST replaced, and well...

[identity profile] skeezix1000.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
To be fair, some of the proposed policies, like the $10 downtown toll, are extremely bad policy. But I'm sure that the people involved in this poll were answering more out of self-interest than on policy grounds...

[identity profile] friendofjack.livejournal.com 2007-04-04 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think that is unique to Canadians. I think it's human nature. People will answer one way when a purely ideal question is presented and then answer another way when the specifics of how to implement that ideal are asked.

It makes sense. If I quizzed lots of people on whether or not they'd want 6-pack abs, I'd get an overwhelming "yes." If I followed up with questions about whether they wanted those killer abs through "diet" or "exercise," I'd get a much less enthusiastic response.

The 2nd and 3rd suggestions (no driving one day per week and a $10 fee to drive downtown) sound like really horrible ideas. There would be no better way to destroy a vibrant downtown than to charge a fee for going there. Businesses would flee the city for the suburbs in no time.