c9 (
c9
) wrote
2006
-
07
-
06
08:47 pm
No Fair
How does Moncton get better Google Maps satellite imagery than Kitchener-Waterloo?
Where I'm staying and working in a couple weeks
Where we live
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
jamincan.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 01:16 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Ask yourself why
Wiarton
(http://maps.google.com/) of all places gets better coverage.
no subject
lifein2x3.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 01:27 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I was about to say that it's the same way Smithfield, my home town of 6,000 people, had it when Richmond, with a population of about a million, doesn't. But as it turns out, Richmond now does. Yay.
no subject
ex-halfwitte432.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 03:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
The Region of Waterloo buys much higher-quality aerial photos and puts them up here
(http://locator.region.waterloo.on.ca/)
no subject
c9.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 05:25 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Cool! Too bad their site won't work properly in Firefox. For me, anyway.
no subject
skeezix1000.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 07:14 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Kanata has better satellite images on Google than central Toronto.
no subject
c9.livejournal.com
2006-07-07 07:47 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Kanata's full of geeks! I know several of them actually. But so's KW. It's weird.
6 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject